To help you understand the limits of wikipedia's reliability and due to the fact that the quote was not attributed to a reliable source. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.
The reliability of wikipedia varies a lot, depending on the quality and amount of attention an article gets this is not always obvious to the casual reader, a fact that led to the dictum known as kozierok's 1st law: the apparent accuracy of a wik. Numerous studies have rated wikipedia's accuracy on the whole, the web encyclopedia is fairly reliable, but life's little mysteries own.
The reliability of wikipedia because wikipedia cannot be considered a reliable source, the use of wikipedia is not accepted in many schools and universities in. Wikipedia:reliable sources this is a guideline about the types of sources which are reliable wikipedia articles should use it is not a reliable source.
Q: “do librarians consider wikipedia reliable enough for research” what an interesting question since wikipedia’s inception in january, 2001 (see cnn’s 2005 q & a with wikipedia founder jimmy wales), this online encyclopedia has stimulated on-going discussions about its reliability.
Information provided in passing by an otherwise reliable source that is not related to the principal topics of wikipedia:reliable source examples. How can the answer be improved.
Wikipedia: credible research source or not question how do i get students to realize that wikipedia should not be used as a credible source.